Snugpak Pakbox WGTE - Travel Packing Cubes for Organising Gear, Clothes, Essentials - Heavy-Duty Ripstop Fabric Packing Cubes with Mesh Viewing Panel for Travel, Camping, and Home Storage (2023 Style)

Was unsure whether this would be useful or just another good idea which did not work! It was really useful inside the suitcase when we were on atouring holiday. Kept clothes together, neatly and seemed to take up less room than when they were loose in the case. Bought two and can see that I will use them frequently.

If you're considering this range, I'd advise you to take a look at the eBags range before committing yourself.Having just taken delivery of the 2 litre version of the Pakbox, a number of comparisons can be drawn with the eBags packing cubes. Firstly, it is small: smaller than you may expect from the photograph above. If we use the supplied dimensions to calculate the capacity of each bag:Snugpak 2: 23cm x 20cm x 6cm = 2.8 litreeBags Medium: 34.9 x 24.8 x 7.6 = 6.6 litreeBags Small: 27.9 x 17.2 x 7.6 = 3.6 litreebags Slim: 35.6 x 12.7 x 7 = 3.2 litreThe Snugpak PakBox is well made but, I would argue, not as well made as the eBags. For example, the zip pulls don't feel as robust and don't have the attached pulls that you find on the eBags.Nor does the Snugpak compete particularly well on weight. At 100g it is slightly heavier than the small eBag and only slightly lighter than the medium eBag - which, I believe, is 110g in weight. Where the Pakbox system may score, is if you're looking for packing cubes with a squarer footprint than that which the eBags offer.Finally, there's the issue of price. If I had exclusively chosen this range over eBags, it would almost certainly have cost considerably more to cater for the same capacity. For example, a pack of three small eBags cost £16.99. Three Pakbox 2 would have cost me £20.67. And this still flatters the Pakbox because, to get a similar capacity to the three small eBags, would actually require closer to four Pakbox 2.So, in summary, the eBags are lighter, cheaper, and appear to me to be better made. The only reason I can supply for preferring the Snugpak 2 is its squarer footprint - together with the tentative suggestion that the heavier weight might reflect slightly tougher, more durable materials.

I bought this so I could make cadet camps easier and it really doeswhen I packed all my clothes I needed for 2 day fitted into it then it easily went into my bag it saved loads of spaceDuring the camp it was easier to keep track of my clothes (others lying about) and I kept them all togetherThen during th night I found out that when when full it can be used as a PILLLOW!!!And when it was time to leave it packed nicely and fitted into the bagOverall a great bit of kit for Amy camping trip to make life and packing a lot easier I don't go on any camps without it

Good pack nice size. Only 3 star due to too high price

Keeps your bags in order

I have used packing squares from Eagle Creek and others, and find them essential for organizing underwear and toiletries in my travel bag. These Snugpak bags are as good or better than others, and at a lower cost. Excellent! A note on sizing - the two liter Pakbox is about 8 inches on a side and holds toiletries nicely, or socks and underpants for 4 days, or a couple of rolled t-shirts. For longer travel get one of the next size up as well.

This bag is a little bigger than I was expecting, but that's not a bad thing.easily fits 3 pairs of socks, 3 underwear, 3 t-shirts and a pair of gloves with room to spare.Seems sturdy enough to take a good pulling and will come in very handy for trips.

perfect for organizing your rucksack, I was surprised how well made it is and strong, I am pretty terrible with packing so it is exactly what I needed!

Exactly as advertised, makes packing for overnight hikes, work trips or camping a breeze. Went to buy a couple more and the price had tripled! 😮

Parfait pour le rangement de mon sac

Parfait pour compartimenter mon sac

Article parfait pour l'organisation de mon sac

Perfect size to pack all your under garments